Hi all. My earlier post about Republicans in Michigan trying to deny people who's homes have been foreclosed on may not be true. A friend of mine contacted a friend of hers who lives in Michigan, and there has been no mention of this anywhere there. It also turns out that the source, the "Michigan Messenger" is a very left leaning blog. Now, I know that this is a left leaning blog as well, but that does not mean that I am going let bad information pass off as the truth, even if it benefits my side.
Anyway, the "Messenger" is standing by its story. The Michigan Republican party is of course saying it is not true. Here is a link to an article about this in the Detroit News:
http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080912/POLITICS01/809120380/1409/METRO
I will keep looking into this story, and will post any significant updates. If this turns out to be false, I am truly sorry for passing on bad information. Lies and distortions have NO PLACE in the political process, no matter which side they come from.
Sunday, September 14, 2008
As mayor, Palin charged rape victims for rape kits
From Huffington Post:
Despite denials by the Palin campaign, new evidence proves that as mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, Sarah Palin had a direct hand in imposing fees to pay for post-sexual assault medical exams conducted by the city to gather evidence.
Despite denials by the Palin campaign, new evidence proves that as mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, Sarah Palin had a direct hand in imposing fees to pay for post-sexual assault medical exams conducted by the city to gather evidence.
Palin's role is now confirmed by Wasilla City budget documents available online.
Here is the whole storyhttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/jacob-alperinsheriff/sarah-palin-instituted-ra_b_125833.html
From the Boston Globe:Alaska pols: Wasilla charged victims for rape kits
http://news.bostonherald.com/news/2008/view.bg?articleid=1118416&srvc=2008campaign&position=9Palin's record in Alaska
Seems her claims of being a reformer might be a bit of an exaggeration. Shocking, I know.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/14/us/politics/14palin.html?hp=&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1221343324-tGxa66AkDRYq1tsNYpjoIw&pagewanted=all
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/14/us/politics/14palin.html?hp=&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1221343324-tGxa66AkDRYq1tsNYpjoIw&pagewanted=all
McCain campaign lying about Palin crowd sizes?
The McCain camp is claiming huge turnouts for their rallies featuring Sarah Palin. They say these numbers come from local fire departments and Secret Service estimates. Problem is, neither of these groups gave them any numbers. So, where are they getting these crowd estimates from? Seems they might be just making them up.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=a1J0tfV3XJYs&refer=politics
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=a1J0tfV3XJYs&refer=politics
Lose your house, lose your vote
Michigan Republicans plan to foreclose African-American voters
http://www.michiganmessenger.com/4076/lose-your-house-lose-your-vote
The chairman of the Republican Party in Macomb County, Michigan, a key swing county in a key swing state, is planning to use a list of foreclosed homes to block people from voting in the upcoming election as part of the state GOP’s effort to challenge some voters on Election Day.
“We will have a list of foreclosed homes and will make sure people aren’t voting from those addresses,” party chairman James Carabelli told Michigan Messenger in a telephone interview earlier this week. He said the local party wanted to make sure that proper electoral procedures were followed.
Here is the whole story...http://www.michiganmessenger.com/4076/lose-your-house-lose-your-vote
Women Against Palin Rally in Alaska
Here is a first hand account of the "Women Against Palin" rally in Alaska. Seems about 1,400 people showed up, which is a HUGE turnout for any sort of Alaska rally.
http://mudflats.wordpress.com/
http://mudflats.wordpress.com/
Thursday, September 11, 2008
Thomas Franks article
This is a great article about how the GOP destroys the small town America they claim to love so much...
http://www.wsj.com/article/SB122100226859616967.html?mod=hpp_us_inside_today
http://www.wsj.com/article/SB122100226859616967.html?mod=hpp_us_inside_today
Awesome Garrison Keillor article
This is a perfect summary of the McCain strategy...
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-oped0910keillorsep10,0,7101227.column
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-oped0910keillorsep10,0,7101227.column
Tuesday, September 9, 2008
New McCain ad hits new low
Seems McCain has a new smear ad running accusing Obama of supporting sex education of kindergarten kids. truth is, the bill he supported (but did not sponsor as McCain apparently claims) age appropriate sex ed for kids. The kindergarten kids would have learned about how to stay away from sexual predators. Is Mark Foley working for McCain, writing his ads? Here are some links debunking the story.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/postpartisan/2008/09/does_the_truth_matter_anymore.html?hpid=topnews
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/staff/margaret_talev/story/52169.html
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/postpartisan/2008/09/does_the_truth_matter_anymore.html?hpid=topnews
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/staff/margaret_talev/story/52169.html
So who actually vetted Palin?
Apparently John McCain's vetting process consisted of Googling Sarah Palin's name, and talking to her on the phone for 15 minutes. However, there was one group who vetted her, and they REALLY liked what they saw. Read this article and see if you want these people in the high levels of the US Government.
http://www.talk2action.org/story/2008/9/1/24846/28141/Front_Page/The_Council_For_National_Policy_Meets_In_Minn_Vets_Palin
http://www.talk2action.org/story/2008/9/1/24846/28141/Front_Page/The_Council_For_National_Policy_Meets_In_Minn_Vets_Palin
A letter from a resident of Wasilla Alaska about Palin
Interesting letter written by someone who knows Palin.
http://www.crosscut.com/politics-government/17341
http://www.crosscut.com/politics-government/17341
Women Against Palin
This is a blog that was started as an e-mail. The people that started it sent out an e-mail to 40 friends asking them to express their concerns about the Palin nomination.
Here is the letter:
Friends, compatriots, fellow-lamenters,
We are writing to you because of the fury and dread we have felt since the announcement of Sarah Palin as the Vice-Presidential candidate for the Republican Party. We believe that this terrible decision has surpassed mere partisanship, and that it is a dangerous farce—on the part of a pandering and rudderless Presidential candidate—that has a real possibility of becoming fact.
Perhaps like us, as American women, you share the fear of what Ms. Palin and her professed beliefs and proven record could lead to for ourselves and for our present or future daughters. To date, she is against sex education, birth control, the pro-choice platform, environmental protection, alternative energy development, freedom of speech (as mayor she wanted to ban books and attempted to fire the librarian who stood against her), gun control, the separation of church and state, and polar bears. To say nothing of her complete lack of real preparation to become the second-most-powerful person on the planet.
We want to clarify that we are not against Sarah Palin as a woman, a mother, or, for that matter, a parent of a pregnant teenager, but solely as a rash, incompetent, and all together devastating choice for Vice President. Ms. Palin's political views are in every way a slap in the face to the accomplishments that our mothers and grandmothers and great-grandmothers so fiercely fought for, and that we've so demonstrably benefited from.
First and foremost, Ms. Palin does not represent us. She does not demonstrate or uphold our interests as American women. It is presumed that the inclusion of a woman on the Republican ticket could win over women voters. We want to disagree, publicly.
Therefore, we invite you to reply here: with a short, succinct message about why you, as a woman living in this country, do not support this candidate as second-in-command for our nation.
Please include your name (last initial is fine), age, and place of residence.
We will post your responses on a blog called "Women Against Sarah Palin," which we intend to publicize as widely as possible. Please send us your reply at your earliest convenience—the greater the volume of responses we receive, the stronger our message will be.
Thank you for your time and action.
VIVA!
Sincerely,
Quinn Latimer and Lyra Kilston
New York, NY
womensaynopalin@gmail.com
**PLEASE FORWARD WIDELY! If you send this to 20 women in the next hour, you could be blessed with a country that takes your concerns seriously. Stranger things have happened.
Here is a link to the blog. I will also include this in my links section.
http://womenagainstsarahpalin.blogspot.com/
Here is the letter:
Friends, compatriots, fellow-lamenters,
We are writing to you because of the fury and dread we have felt since the announcement of Sarah Palin as the Vice-Presidential candidate for the Republican Party. We believe that this terrible decision has surpassed mere partisanship, and that it is a dangerous farce—on the part of a pandering and rudderless Presidential candidate—that has a real possibility of becoming fact.
Perhaps like us, as American women, you share the fear of what Ms. Palin and her professed beliefs and proven record could lead to for ourselves and for our present or future daughters. To date, she is against sex education, birth control, the pro-choice platform, environmental protection, alternative energy development, freedom of speech (as mayor she wanted to ban books and attempted to fire the librarian who stood against her), gun control, the separation of church and state, and polar bears. To say nothing of her complete lack of real preparation to become the second-most-powerful person on the planet.
We want to clarify that we are not against Sarah Palin as a woman, a mother, or, for that matter, a parent of a pregnant teenager, but solely as a rash, incompetent, and all together devastating choice for Vice President. Ms. Palin's political views are in every way a slap in the face to the accomplishments that our mothers and grandmothers and great-grandmothers so fiercely fought for, and that we've so demonstrably benefited from.
First and foremost, Ms. Palin does not represent us. She does not demonstrate or uphold our interests as American women. It is presumed that the inclusion of a woman on the Republican ticket could win over women voters. We want to disagree, publicly.
Therefore, we invite you to reply here: with a short, succinct message about why you, as a woman living in this country, do not support this candidate as second-in-command for our nation.
Please include your name (last initial is fine), age, and place of residence.
We will post your responses on a blog called "Women Against Sarah Palin," which we intend to publicize as widely as possible. Please send us your reply at your earliest convenience—the greater the volume of responses we receive, the stronger our message will be.
Thank you for your time and action.
VIVA!
Sincerely,
Quinn Latimer and Lyra Kilston
New York, NY
womensaynopalin@gmail.com
**PLEASE FORWARD WIDELY! If you send this to 20 women in the next hour, you could be blessed with a country that takes your concerns seriously. Stranger things have happened.
Here is a link to the blog. I will also include this in my links section.
http://womenagainstsarahpalin.blogspot.com/
Anti-McCain T-Shirts
This is a t-shirt my friend Chris designed. Available for sale on Cafe Press.
www.cafepress.com/triggermitten
www.cafepress.com/triggermitten
Alaska National Guard General Changes Story; Palin Promotes
From Huffington Post:
Alaska National Guard General Changes Story; Palin Promotes
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brandon-friedman/alaska-national-guard-gen_b_125083.html
Alaska National Guard General Changes Story; Palin Promotes
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brandon-friedman/alaska-national-guard-gen_b_125083.html
Monday, September 8, 2008
Palin's Church is a bit much
Here is an article from Huffington Post about this as well. Scary stuff if you are not a fundamentalist Christian.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruce-wilson/sarah-palins-churches-and_b_124611.html
Sunday, September 7, 2008
Bridge To Nowhere
There has been a lot of talk about the so called "Bridge To Nowhere." However, I'm not sure a lot of people know exactly what that issue is all about. At least, I didn't until recently. Basically, it involved the Alaska Congressional delegation obtaining almost $400,000,000 to build a bridge to service a very small population in Alaska and help get them to the airport. They actually had a ferry service that ran every half hour at a cost of $6 round trip. Basically, it was a way for Alaska to get a ton of free federal money. In the end, the bridge project was scrapped, due to public outcry. However, Alaska got the money for the project. Sarah Palin is making a big deal about the fact that she was against this project. Of course, this is not true. She was originally all for the project, then backed off when it was becoming a political liability. So, to paraphrase John Kerry, she was for it before she was against it.
Here is a Wikipedia article about it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravina_Island_Bridge
Here is a Wikipedia article about it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravina_Island_Bridge
Palin = Bush
Here is a great article about how Palin is almost an exact repeat of George W. Bush
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/07/sarah-palin-george-bush-i_n_124654.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/07/sarah-palin-george-bush-i_n_124654.html
Palin wanted Alaska to break away from the US
In more Palin fun, it turns out she was a member of the Alaskan Independence Party, a political party who wants Alaska to seced from the United States. Country first? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/uselection2008/johnmccain/2667214/John-McCains-running-mate-Sarah-Palin-was-in-Alaskan-independence-party.html
More Palin Fun
Here is a very nice link to a Media Matters article about just how corrupt Sarah Palin is. Needless to say, the corporate media is not really reporting any of this:
http://mediamattersaction.org/palin_myths
http://mediamattersaction.org/palin_myths
Sarah Palin, the gift that keeps on giving...
Wow. Could Sarah Palin be any more unqualified to be Vice President? Kind of throws the whole "lack of experience" argument about Obama out the window, doesn't it? Sadly, the Republicans are trying to lie and spin their way out of that trap. They have actually said that she has more executive experience that Obama and Biden combined (and by that rational, John McCain as well). Does anyone seriously think that someone who, only two years ago was trying to decide what time to close the town dump (thanks to Thom Hartman for that analogy), is ready to be president should 72 year old John McCain not be able to finish his term for any reason? Foreign policy? She has no experience (despite claims made by the GOP that she knows all about Russia, because Alaska is so close to Russia, that she must be an expert. No, I'm not kidding. They said that with a straight face. Read about it here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/greg-mitchell/cindy-mccain-on-abc-today_b_122759.html) She is also a very scary fundamentalist Christian who is actually looking forward to the end times. They are supportive of a group know as "Joel's Army," that is actually forming armed military groups planning to take over and enforce the rule of God here on earth. Here are some stories about that:
http://www.talk2action.org/story/2008/8/29/182057/888
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/8/29/163234/559/495/579213
http://www.alternet.org/story/96945/theocratic_sect_prays_for_real_armageddon/?page=entire
In addition to that, she is also under investigation for trying to force the Alaska Director of Public Safety to fire her state trooper brother in law, after he filed for divorce from her sister. Watch the ABC news summary here:
By the way, the person she hired to replace the Public Safety Commissioner had to resign after 2 weeks, due to charges of sexual harassment.
http://www.talk2action.org/story/2008/8/29/182057/888
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/8/29/163234/559/495/579213
http://www.alternet.org/story/96945/theocratic_sect_prays_for_real_armageddon/?page=entire
In addition to that, she is also under investigation for trying to force the Alaska Director of Public Safety to fire her state trooper brother in law, after he filed for divorce from her sister. Watch the ABC news summary here:
By the way, the person she hired to replace the Public Safety Commissioner had to resign after 2 weeks, due to charges of sexual harassment.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)